DEEP DOWN, WE ALL WANT THAT NEW PERSON WE'RE DATING TO BE LIKE A VIRGIN. LIKE SOMEONE WHO CHALKS UP AMAZING ANAL LIKE, "HMM, BEGINNER'S LUCK." [ LAUGHTER ]BUT ASKING ABOUT THEIR PAST IS A BAD IDEA. ALL THAT BLUE --THOSE PEOPLE SAID THERE IS SUCH A THING AS TOO MANY PARTNERS. THEY DON'T GIVE A [BLEEP][ LAUGHTER ] NOW, 10 YEARS LATER, THE REDNESSIS SPREADING. [ LAUGHTER ]BUT UNTIL WE ALL STOP ASKING FOR NUMBERS, DON'T BE ASHAMED OF YOURS, 'CAUSE WHENEVER A GUY ASKS FOR MINE, I DON'T HIDE FROMIT.
Sweers’ own Internet fame and/or financial gain,” attorney Ross Plont, who represents both men, claimed in a suit.
While Kolk was not charged, he claims Sweers’s video cost him his job.
The video, which racked up more than 1 million views, purportedly showed Kolk arriving to meet a 14-year-old girl for sex (who was actually Sweers).
I KNOW YOU DON'T WANT TO, BUT IT'LL ONLY LAST A MINUTE. PLUS IT'S LIKE ASKING YOUR DAD WHAT POSITION YOU WERE CONCEIVED IN.
[ LAUGHTER ]TONIGHT I WANT TO TALK ABOUT AN OLD-FASHIONED DICK MOVE --ASKING YOUR PARTNER THEIRNUMBER.
[ LAUGHTER ]ANY NUMBER THEY SAY FEELS WRONG, AND IT'S TOO EASY FOR YOU TO GETIN YOUR HEAD ABOUT IT. I JUST TELL THEM MY NUMBER CAN DRIVE A RENTAL CAR AT A SENIOR DISCOUNT.The channel had more than 200,000 subscribers before the videos were removed or made private by You Tube.In one video, Sweers films a would-be assailant outside a Taco Bell, where the man claims he only wanted to warn Sweers’ fictional teenager of the dangers of internet dating.“To be honest with you, I was gonna talk her out of it,” the man says.(During an earlier online conversation, he allegedly offered to buy Sweers a dildo.)“The Defendants have taken it upon themselves to be Judge, Jury, and Executioner in the eyes of public opinion to smear Plaintiff’s name in a negative light across the Internet and local news media outlets all for Mr.